UML state machine - Wikipedia. UML state machine,[1] also known as UML statechart, is a significantly enhanced realization of the mathematical concept of a finite automaton in computer science applications as expressed in the Unified Modeling Language (UML) notation. The concepts behind it are about organizing the way a device, computer program, or other (often technical) process works such that an entity or each of its sub- entities is always in exactly one of a number of possible states and where there are well- defined conditional transitions between these states. IV. State and Activity Diagrams State Diagrams. In UML, there are four types. there may be transitions in an activity diagram with. I am really unable to understand the real difference between these 2 diagrams. I mean both of these deal is "states" but I am not sure what deals with what? ![]() UML state machine is an object- based variant of Harel statechart,[2] adapted and extended by UML.[1] ,[3] The goal of UML state machines is to overcome the main limitations of traditional finite- state machines while retaining their main benefits. UML statecharts introduce the new concepts of hierarchically nested states and orthogonal regions, while extending the notion of actions. UML state machines have the characteristics of both Mealy machines and Moore machines. They support actions that depend on both the state of the system and the triggering event, as in Mealy machines, as well as entry and exit actions, which are associated with states rather than transitions, as in Moore machines.[4]The term "UML state machine" can refer to two kinds of state machines: behavioral state machines and protocol state machines. Behavioral state machines can be used to model the behavior of individual entities (e. Protocol state machines are used to express usage protocols and can be used to specify the legal usage scenarios of classifiers, interfaces, and ports. Basic state machine concepts[edit]Many software systems are event- driven, which means that they continuously wait for the occurrence of some external or internal event such as a mouse click, a button press, a time tick, or an arrival of a data packet. After recognizing the event, such systems react by performing the appropriate computation that may include manipulating the hardware or generating “soft” events that trigger other internal software components. That’s why event- driven systems are alternatively called reactive systems.) Once the event handling is complete, the system goes back to waiting for the next event. The response to an event generally depends on both the type of the event and on the internal state of the system and can include a change of state leading to a state transition. The pattern of events, states, and state transitions among those states can be abstracted and represented as a finite- state machine (FSM). The concept of a FSM is important in event- driven programming because it makes the event handling explicitly dependent on both the event- type and on the state of the system. When used correctly, a state machine can drastically cut down the number of execution paths through the code, simplify the conditions tested at each branching point, and simplify the switching between different modes of execution.[5] Conversely, using event- driven programming without an underlying FSM model can lead programmers to produce error prone, difficult to extend and excessively complex application code.[6]Basic UML state diagrams[edit]UML preserves the general form of the traditional state diagrams. The UML state diagrams are directed graphs in which nodes denote states and connectors denote state transitions. For example, Figure 1 shows a UML state diagram corresponding to the computer keyboard state machine. In UML, states are represented as rounded rectangles labeled with state names. The transitions, represented as arrows, are labeled with the triggering events followed optionally by the list of executed actions. The initial transition originates from the solid circle and specifies the default state when the system first begins. UML 2 Activity Diagram. Activity. The following sections describe the elements that constitute an activity diagram. The difference between the two node. Hi All, can anyone explain the difference between Activity and StateChart diagram. rgds Rishi. Difference: Activity Diagram and Sequence Diagram. In UML Activity diagram is used for functional modeling. what is difference between old & new version of uml? Every state diagram should have such a transition, which should not be labeled, since it is not triggered by an event. The initial transition can have associated actions. Figure 1: UML state diagram representing the computer keyboard state machine. An event is something that happens that affects the system. Strictly speaking, in the UML specification,[1] the term event refers to the type of occurrence rather than to any concrete instance of that occurrence. For example, Keystroke is an event for the keyboard, but each press of a key is not an event but a concrete instance of the Keystroke event. Another event of interest for the keyboard might be Power- on, but turning the power on tomorrow at 1. Power- on event. An event can have associated parameters, allowing the event instance to convey not only the occurrence of some interesting incident but also quantitative information regarding that occurrence. For example, the Keystroke event generated by pressing a key on a computer keyboard has associated parameters that convey the character scan code as well as the status of the Shift, Ctrl, and Alt keys. An event instance outlives the instantaneous occurrence that generated it and might convey this occurrence to one or more state machines. Once generated, the event instance goes through a processing life cycle that can consist of up to three stages. First, the event instance is received when it is accepted and waiting for processing (e. Later, the event instance is dispatched to the state machine, at which point it becomes the current event. Finally, it is consumed when the state machine finishes processing the event instance. A consumed event instance is no longer available for processing. A state captures the relevant aspects of the system's history very efficiently. For example, when you strike a key on a keyboard, the character code generated will be either an uppercase or a lowercase character, depending on whether the Caps Lock is active. Therefore, the keyboard's behavior can be divided into two states: the "default" state and the "caps_locked" state. Most keyboards include an LED that indicates that the keyboard is in the "caps_locked" state.) The behavior of a keyboard depends only on certain aspects of its history, namely whether the Caps Lock key has been pressed, but not, for example, on how many and exactly which other keys have been pressed previously. A state can abstract away all possible (but irrelevant) event sequences and capture only the relevant ones. To relate this concept to programming, this means that instead of recording the event history in a multitude of variables, flags, and convoluted logic, you rely mainly on just one state variable that can assume only a limited number of a priori determined values (e. The value of the state variable defines the current state of the system at any given time. The concept of state reduces the problem of identifying the execution context in the code to testing just the state variable instead of many variables, thus eliminating a lot of conditional logic. Extended states[edit]One possible interpretation of state for software systems is that each state represents one distinct set of valid values of the whole program memory. Even for simple programs with only a few elementary variables, this interpretation leads to an astronomical number of states. For example, a single 3. Clearly, this interpretation is not practical, so program variables are commonly dissociated from states. Rather, the complete condition of the system (called the extended state) is the combination of a qualitative aspect (the state) and the quantitative aspects (the extended state variables). In this interpretation, a change of variable does not always imply a change of the qualitative aspects of the system behavior and therefore does not lead to a change of state.[7]State machines supplemented with variables are called extended state machines and UML state machines belong to this category. Extended state machines can apply the underlying formalism to much more complex problems than is practical without including extended state variables.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |